the illusion of intellect

intellect takes a prominent stand in western philosophys journey. it seems logic and definite composite ideas, that from which the humans logical intellectual faculty makes clear sense and ordered nature, are the most virtuous and valuable to the mind.
but in dedicating to that we lose the other realms of the mind,.
intellect and emotion are two possible categorisations for the human mind. primative, yes, though farther reaching than solely reason.
emotion, deriving from love(and everything on its all-encompassing scale), is neglected by this philosophical modus operandi, as its fluctuations cause irritation to the reason; yet its equilibriums and conundrum can symbolise that which Kant would stress lyrically to the point of imiricy.
silly it is to try and work out the outer realms of the mind with an introspective valuative approach. thats to say reason occupies a high seat in teh mind, though how can we see the sky when were perched on a throne, which weve beautifully adorned, and elaborated so brightly that it supercedes dawn.

i believe too that this addiction to reason has spawned treason within the ranks of humans. women in the years BC (and after) were physically weaker, thus subservient for the embellishment of civilization done by 'strong' men. thats to say might was right: those at the top had fought tooth and nail to project their philo-vies: how they found their way to the top they would press hard upon the flocks beneath, and this battle was fought not just in reality, but in the mind. like man against woman(tbc) The fights fought in the mind were dominated by reason and 'strength' of mind, as its logical framework unfolded the same in every brain, or was imposable.. but how could it tackle the imagination? or love? or ambition? aspiration? even inspiration? these echelons are part of the infinte; reason is a merely the keyhole to the door of perception. tbc

RAMBLINGS

IT SEEMS IDEAS ALL ROTATE.
THE MIND SITS THERE OBSERVING, AND REASON COMES OUT VROM BEHIND HER VEIL DE TEMPS EN TEMPS, AND HERE REALISATION OCCURS;

BUT IT SEEMS LIKE WERE GOING ROUND AND ROUND IN CIRCLES, - THOUGH IS THIS NOT THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY? SHOULD THIS NOT BE ACCEPTED FROM THE OFF..?

BUT WHY THEN MUST THE SAME TRUTHS MANIFEST THEMSELVES IN DIFFERENT GUISES AGAIN AND AGAIN? IS IT SUBSTANCE ABUSE STOPPING CONTINUOUS ENLIGHTENMENT? MEMORY IS A MERE FACULTY, SHOULD NOT STOP THE CONCRETE FROM BEING SET IN STONE ONCE, THEN FOR ALL..........,.